Question 3 of 86 in this topic
Difficulty: HardParagraph Comprehension
Many criminal-law statutes permit more severe punishment of a person convicted of a crime if he or she
intended to harm another person. For example, voluntary manslaughter carries a heavier penalty than
involuntary manslaughter in most states. Planned crimes are also punished more severely than spur-ofthe-moment crimes. The problem is that juries find it difficult to know what the intent of a person was at the
time he or she committed a crime. Many defendants will deny that they intended to harm the other person
and claim that any harm that occurred was "accidental." The law asks too much of juries when it expects
them to determine what a person was thinking. Juries should only be asked to weigh objective evidence
According to this passage:
Want a deeper, personalized explanation?
Open the app to get an AI-powered explanation tailored to your mistakes.
Open the app